Fix the bot that is confusing customers, losing leads, or wasting your team's time.
TUNDRÄ audits broken Telegram bots, WhatsApp chatbots, and AI agents, then repairs the flows, prompts, handoffs, integrations, and tracking that keep them from working in production.
- Flow audit
- Prompt and knowledge review
- Integration checks
- Repair-or-rebuild plan
Repair, stabilize, or rebuild after the technical snapshot is visible.
A bot can be technically live and still fail the business.
Real customers expose problems that demos hide: wrong answers, loops, missed leads, silent integration failures, unclear ownership, and monthly costs nobody planned.
- The first goal is diagnosis, not selling a rebuild.
- Repair works when the foundation is usable and access is available.
- Rebuild is recommended only when repair would create a fragile patchwork.
Signs your bot needs rescue
These are the issues that usually show up once real customers start using a Telegram bot, WhatsApp chatbot, or AI agent.
Wrong or risky answers
The bot invents information, gives outdated details, answers outside its scope, or sounds confident when it should escalate.
- Hallucinations
- Outdated policies
- No refusal rules
- No escalation
Users get trapped
The bot repeats itself, ignores human requests, or cannot recover when users ask the same thing differently.
- Looping replies
- No escape phrase
- Weak fallback
- Ignored handoff
Leads disappear
The bot collects partial details, fails to notify sales, misses high-intent chats, or does not sync to CRM.
- Partial forms
- No sales alert
- CRM miss
- No lead score
Integrations fail silently
Payments, webhooks, calendars, CRMs, spreadsheets, or databases break without alerts or recovery behavior.
- Webhook errors
- Payment callbacks
- No retries
- No alerts
Every rescue ends with repair, takeover, or rebuild.
The diagnostic sprint should make the next step explicit instead of leaving the team with a vague estimate.
Fix the current bot
Best when the core workflow is useful and failures are concentrated in prompts, content, handoff, or a few integrations.
- Useful flow
- Known access
- Visible logs
- Few broken parts
Keep the bot, change ownership
Best when the bot works but the business lacks a runbook, monitoring, documentation, or support ownership.
- Access cleanup
- Monitoring
- Runbook
- Support path
Replace the unsafe setup
Best when source is missing, secrets are risky, platform limits block the fix, or architecture is more expensive to patch than replace.
- Missing source
- Unsafe secrets
- Dead dependencies
- No deploy route
The audit can usually happen without downtime. Production changes should be staged and tested.
Symptoms point to different repair paths.
A rescue audit should connect user-visible failures to the layer that is probably causing them before anyone edits production.
| Symptom | Likely cause | What we check | Likely outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wrong or risky answers | Conflicting source content, weak prompt boundaries, no refusal rules | Prompts, knowledge files, examples, unanswered logs, escalation triggers | Knowledge cleanup, guardrail rewrite, fallback and handoff rules |
| Users ask for a human but stay trapped | No escape phrase, no agent route, missing conversation summary | Flow branches, fallback states, handoff events, staff notification path | Handoff button, summary payload, agent alert, unresolved-topic tracking |
| Leads disappear or arrive incomplete | Partial capture, failed CRM sync, no retry, no owner for hot leads | Lead fields, webhook responses, CRM mapping, alert logs, duplicate handling | Reliable lead schema, retries, sales alert, CRM or Sheets repair |
| Bot works in demo but fails live | Hosting, token, webhook, rate limit, database, or dependency issue | Server logs, webhook endpoint, secrets, deployment path, error handling | Stabilization plan, monitoring, deployment cleanup, rebuild trigger if needed |
Useful access makes rescue faster and less risky.
The audit can start with screenshots and failed chats, but technical conclusions improve when the current setup is visible.
If access is incomplete, start with a black-box review and use the findings to recover the missing pieces.
| Access area | What helps | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Conversation evidence | Failed chats, user complaints, screenshots, timestamps | Shows what customers experience before technical assumptions are made |
| Platform/admin access | Bot admin, WABA/BSP access, no-code builder access, channel owner | Confirms what can be repaired without replacing the bot |
| Code and hosting | Repository, deployment target, environment variables, logs, database access | Separates flow problems from infrastructure failures |
| Connected systems | CRM, Sheets, payments, calendar, email, analytics, webhook targets | Finds silent integration failures and missing retries |
| Business owner | One person who can approve scope, risk, and launch timing | Prevents half-fixed production changes from stalling |
Not every failure deserves the same response.
Severity helps decide whether to monitor, repair, pause automation, or rebuild.
| Severity | Typical signal | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Annoying | Minor wording issues, weak fallback copy, low-volume complaints | Patch copy, improve fallback, review after more traffic |
| Revenue leak | Qualified leads missing, sales notified late, booking details incomplete | Prioritize lead capture and routing repair before cosmetic work |
| Trust risk | AI gives unsafe answers, wrong policy, price, or compliance-sensitive advice | Constrain answers, add refusal and human handoff, review source content |
| Production failure | Webhook down, payments broken, bot unreachable, no logs | Stabilize infrastructure first, then decide repair or rebuild |
Diagnosis first. Repair plan before rebuild recommendations.
A rescue project should not start by touching production blindly. The first paid outcome is clarity about what is broken and what is worth saving.
Find what is failing and why
A focused review of flow, prompts, knowledge, handoff, integrations, logs, hosting, and ownership.
- Conversation map
- Failure review
- Access check
- Risk notes
- Repair plan
Fix high-impact failures first
For bots that are salvageable: wrong answers, broken handoff, missing lead capture, unstable integrations, or unclear alerts.
- Knowledge cleanup
- Guardrail rewrite
- Handoff fixes
- Integration repair
- Analytics
Replace the fragile setup
When code, hosting, ownership, or platform limits make the current bot too risky to repair.
- Flow recovery
- Fresh architecture
- Migration plan
- New deploy path
- Documentation
What the rescue audit covers
The audit separates conversation problems from technical failures so the repair plan targets the right layer.
Flow, fallback, and handoff
Entry points, branches, dead ends, fallback paths, escalation triggers, and human context.
- Branches
- Fallbacks
- Escape phrases
- Handoff summary
Prompts and knowledge
Instructions, sources, conflicting content, memory, refusal behavior, and review loop.
- Prompt rules
- Source quality
- Guardrails
- Review logs
Integrations and hosting
APIs, webhooks, databases, payments, calendars, CRM, queues, errors, and deployment path.
- Webhooks
- Hosting
- Database
- API errors
What usually gets repaired
Most rescue work starts with high-impact fixes that restore trust: safer answers, clearer handoff, reliable lead capture, and visible errors.
Clean up sources
Remove conflicting answers, update outdated content, split topics, and define what the AI is allowed to answer.
- Updated docs
- Topic split
- Answer limits
- Refusal rules
Restore handoff and lead flow
Add handoff buttons, agent notifications, summaries, qualification fields, and routing rules.
- Human button
- Sales alert
- Lead fields
- CRM route
Add analytics and alerts
Track fallback rate, unresolved questions, handoff reasons, conversion steps, and integration errors.
- Fallback rate
- Unanswered topics
- Error alerts
- Conversion steps
Should you fix it or rebuild it?
Some bots need better prompts and handoff. Others are cheaper to rebuild than repair. The audit makes that decision explicit.
| Option | Best for | Risk | TUNDRÄ view |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repair | Useful workflow, clear access, concentrated failures | Hidden legacy issues can appear during testing | Use when the foundation is still usable |
| Rebuild | Missing source, risky data handling, broken state, tool limits | Requires retesting the whole workflow | Use when repair would become a fragile patchwork |
| Black-box review | No code access yet, but real failures are visible | Technical conclusions are limited | Use as the first step when access is incomplete |
Fast diagnosis, practical next steps.
The diagnostic sprint turns vague bot failure into a repair plan with priority, risk, and access requirements.
Access and symptom intake
Share what is failing, where the bot runs, which channels are involved, and what access is available.
Conversation and log review
Inspect real failures, common paths, fallback moments, AI misses, and handoff breakdowns.
Technical check
Review configuration, prompts, APIs, hosting, webhooks, database state, and integration errors where access allows.
Rescue plan
Get prioritized fixes, risk level, estimated effort, and a repair-or-rebuild recommendation.
Rescue questions before we touch anything.
Can you fix a bot without source code?
Sometimes. If the bot has an admin panel or no-code platform access, some fixes may be possible. Without code or hosting access, the audit can identify user-facing problems but may not repair the backend.
Can you rescue WhatsApp bots?
Yes. WhatsApp adds checks for Business API provider, templates, opt-in rules, handoff flow, conversation fees, and Meta-related limits.
Can you rescue AI bots?
Yes. AI rescue usually focuses on knowledge quality, prompt design, guardrails, hallucination control, escalation, and logging.
Will users experience downtime?
The audit can usually happen without downtime. Repairs depend on hosting and deployment setup. Risky production changes should be staged, tested, and deployed deliberately.